2019 Chevy Impala Safety Ratings: Expert Analysis for Car Buyers

The Chevrolet Impala, redesigned in 2014, remains a popular choice in the large sedan category. For the 2019 model year, it’s crucial for potential buyers and automotive enthusiasts to understand its safety performance. This analysis delves into the 2019 Chevy Impala’s safety ratings, providing a comprehensive breakdown based on rigorous testing standards.

Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Driver-Side

The small overlap front crash test simulates a collision where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end (driver-side in this case) impacts a barrier. This is a particularly demanding test that assesses how well a vehicle’s structure protects occupants in offset frontal crashes.

Rating: Acceptable

Evaluation criteria Rating
Structure and safety cage Acceptable
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Hip/thigh Good
Lower leg/foot Good
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Acceptable

The 2019 Chevy Impala achieved an Acceptable rating in the small overlap front crash test. While the structure and safety cage held up acceptably, and driver injury measures were generally good, there was a notable issue with dummy kinematics.

Action shot from the small overlap frontal crash test of a 2019 Chevrolet Impala, highlighting vehicle deformation and airbag deployment.

Dummy Kinematics and Restraints: During the test, the dummy’s head made contact with the frontal airbag. However, it subsequently slid off to the left, leaving the head potentially vulnerable to impacts with the vehicle’s structure. On a positive note, the side curtain airbag deployed effectively and offered adequate forward coverage, designed to protect the head from side structure and external object contact. The side torso airbag also functioned as intended.

Post-crash dummy position within the 2019 Chevy Impala, illustrating the driver survival space and interaction with safety features like airbags and steering wheel.

Driver Survival Space: Analysis of the dummy’s position relative to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash indicated that the driver’s survival space was maintained reasonably well. This is a critical factor in occupant protection.

Close-up view of the dummy’s head movement during the small overlap test, showing the head sliding off the frontal airbag and into a gap between airbag coverage areas.

Despite the head airbag slippage, the overall risk of injuries to the driver’s legs and feet was assessed as low, further supported by structural performance measurements.

Assessment of driver leg and foot space post-small overlap crash test in the 2019 Chevrolet Impala, indicating good maintenance of space and low injury risk to lower extremities.

Technical Measurements – Small Overlap Front Test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side Measurement
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 11
Footrest (cm) 8
Left toepan (cm) 1
Brake pedal (cm) 3
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 3
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 1
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 6
Upper dash (cm) 8
Lower instrument panel (cm) 8
Driver injury measures Measurement
Head
HIC-15 89
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm) 17
Maximum Nij 0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm) 17
Femur (kN)
Left 0.5
Right 0.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.68
Right 0.32
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.0
Right 0.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 54
Right 48

Moderate Overlap Front Crash Test: Original Test

The moderate overlap front crash test, a more traditional frontal impact assessment, involves a larger portion of the vehicle’s front end colliding with a deformable barrier.

Rating: Good

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Leg/foot, left Good
Leg/foot, right Acceptable
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Good

The 2019 Chevy Impala earned a Good rating in the moderate overlap front crash test. This indicates robust protection in a more common type of frontal collision. All critical aspects, including structure, safety cage, and driver restraints, were rated as good. The only exception was the “Leg/foot, right” injury measure which was rated as Acceptable.

Technical Measurements – Moderate Overlap Front Test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side Measurement
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 4
Left (cm) 8
Center (cm) 10
Right (cm) 7
Brake pedal (cm) 2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 0
Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) -2
Rearward (cm) -8
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0
Driver injury measures Measurement
Head
HIC-15 230
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm) 4
Maximum Nij 0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm) 27
Legs
Femur force – left (kN) 0.6
Femur force – right (kN) 1.9
Knee displacement – left (mm) 0
Knee displacement – right (mm) 1
Maximum tibia index – left 0.55
Maximum tibia index – right 0.47
Tibia axial force – left (kN) 2.9
Tibia axial force – right (kN) 4.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 48
Right 90

Side Impact Crash Test: Original Test

The side impact test evaluates how well the vehicle protects occupants in a side collision, simulating a typical intersection accident.

Rating: Good

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Torso Acceptable
Pelvis/leg Good
Driver head protection Good
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck Good
Torso Good
Pelvis/leg Good
Rear passenger head protection Good

The 2019 Chevy Impala achieved a Good overall rating in the side impact test. It provides good protection for both driver and rear passengers. Driver torso injury measures were rated as Acceptable, while all other categories for both driver and rear passenger were rated as Good.

Technical Measurements – Side Impact Test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side Measurement
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat (cm) -19.5
Driver injury measures Measurement
Head HIC-15 316
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5
Compression (kN) 0.9
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 40
Lateral force (kN) 1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 39
Average deflection (mm) 35
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 4.20
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.67
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.1
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.0
Combined force (kN) 3.1
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 1.1
L-M moment (Nm) 78
A-P moment (Nm) -21
Passenger injury measures Measurement
Head HIC-15 113
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 15
Lateral force (kN) 1.0
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 19
Average deflection (mm) 14
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.19
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.14
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.4
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.6
Combined force (kN) 2.8
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.4
L-M moment (Nm) 108
A-P moment (Nm) -29

Roof Strength Test

The roof strength test measures the roof’s ability to withstand forces in a rollover scenario.

Rating: Good

Overall evaluation Good
Curb weight 3,745 lbs
Peak force 16,836 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.50

The 2019 Chevy Impala received a Good rating for roof strength, with a strength-to-weight ratio of 4.50. This signifies that the roof can withstand over four times the vehicle’s weight, indicating strong rollover protection.

Head Restraints & Seats

This evaluation assesses the effectiveness of the head restraints and seats in preventing neck injuries in rear-end collisions.

Rating: Good

Overall evaluation Good
Dynamic rating Good
Seat/head restraint geometry Good

The 2019 Chevy Impala’s power leather seats and head restraints earned a Good overall rating. Both dynamic performance and seat/head restraint geometry were rated as Good, indicating effective whiplash protection in rear impacts.

Technical Measurements – Head Restraints & Seats

Seat type Power leather seat
Geometry
Backset (mm) 15
Distance below top of head (mm) 17
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 13.1
Head contact time (ms) 56
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 1
Max neck tension (N) 446

Headlights

Headlight performance is crucial for nighttime visibility and accident prevention. The 2019 Chevy Impala was evaluated with two different headlight options.

Rating: Poor (for both headlight types)

Premier Trim (HID Projector Headlights)

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall rating Poor

The Premier trim with HID projector headlights received a Poor overall rating.

Low Beam Performance: Low beams were inadequate on straightaways and fair to inadequate on curves.

High Beam Performance: High beams were fair on the straightaway right side but inadequate in all other scenarios, including curves.

LS and LT Trims (Halogen Projector Headlights)

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall rating Poor

The LS and LT trims with Halogen projector headlights also received a Poor overall rating.

Low Beam Performance: Low beams were inadequate on straightaways and curves.

High Beam Performance: High beams were inadequate on straightaways and curves.

Technical Measurements – Headlights (HID Projector – Premier Trim)

LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 76.0 m None
Straightaway left edge 42.5 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 55.1 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 41.6 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 48.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 38.9 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 129.4 m
Straightaway left edge 99.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 57.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 47.0 m

Technical Measurements – Headlights (Halogen Projector – LS/LT Trims)

LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 73.2 m None
Straightaway left edge 36.4 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 42.9 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 37.3 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 35.1 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 32.3 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 118.6 m
Straightaway left edge 77.7 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 44.9 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 47.7 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 36.0 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 37.6 m

Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle

Front crash prevention systems help mitigate or avoid collisions with other vehicles. The 2019 Chevy Impala offers optional systems with varying levels of effectiveness.

Rating: Superior (with optional Forward Automatic Braking) / Basic (with optional Forward Collision Alert only)

Optional Forward Automatic Braking (Premier Confidence Package)

Rating: Superior

The 2019 Impala with optional Forward Automatic Braking achieved a Superior rating.

  • Forward Collision Warning: Meets requirements.
  • 12 mph Test: Collision Avoided.
  • 25 mph Test: Impact speed reduced by 10 mph.

Optional Forward Collision Alert (Driver Confidence Package)

Rating: Basic

With the optional Forward Collision Alert alone, the 2019 Impala achieves a Basic rating.

  • Forward Collision Warning: Meets requirements.
  • Autobrake: Not available in this package.

Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)

The ease of use of LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) systems for installing child seats is evaluated.

Rating: Acceptable

Overall evaluation Acceptable
Vehicle trim 1LS
Seat type cloth

The 2019 Chevy Impala received an Acceptable rating for its LATCH system. It has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and an additional position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors.

LATCH System Details:

  • Seating Positions with Complete LATCH: 2
  • Additional Tether Anchor Position: 1 (can borrow lower anchors)

Details by Seating Position:

Position Rating Details
1 Tether anchor (easy to find), Lower anchors (too deep, easy to maneuver)
2 Tether anchor (easy to find), Lower anchors (1 dedicated, 1 borrowed, too deep, difficult to maneuver)
3 Tether anchor (easy to find), Lower anchors (too deep, easy to maneuver)

Technical Measurements – Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)

Seat position 21 (Position 3)
Lower anchor A Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: 32 lbs, Clearance angle: 72 degrees
Lower anchor B Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: 27 lbs, Clearance angle: 73 degrees
Tether anchor Location: Rear deck, No confusing hardware
Seat position 22 (Position 2)
Lower anchor B Depth: 4-6 cm, Force: 22 lbs, Clearance angle: 54 degrees
Tether anchor Location: Rear deck, No confusing hardware
Seat position 23 (Position 1)
Lower anchor A Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: 27 lbs, Clearance angle: 68 degrees
Lower anchor B Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: 33 lbs, Clearance angle: 69 degrees
Tether anchor Location: Rear deck, No confusing hardware

Conclusion: 2019 Chevy Impala Safety Performance

The 2019 Chevy Impala demonstrates solid safety performance in most crash tests, achieving Good ratings in moderate overlap front, side impact, roof strength, and head restraints & seats. It earned an Acceptable rating in the more challenging small overlap front test. However, headlight performance is a significant area of weakness, with a Poor rating for both available headlight types. Front crash prevention varies, offering Superior protection with the optional Forward Automatic Braking system and Basic with only Forward Collision Alert. The LATCH system for child seats is rated Acceptable.

For prospective buyers of a 2019 Chevy Impala, understanding these safety ratings is essential. While the Impala offers robust crash protection in many scenarios, the poor headlight rating should be a consideration, especially for those who frequently drive at night. Opting for the Premier Confidence Package with Forward Automatic Braking is advisable to enhance front crash prevention. Overall, the 2019 Chevy Impala provides a generally safe experience, but potential buyers should weigh the headlight and small overlap front performance against its strengths in other safety areas.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *