The 2016 Audi Q3 marked a turning point for the German automaker in the compact SUV segment, particularly with its welcome shift away from dual-clutch transmissions for everyday driving. As an automotive expert, I’ve spent considerable time evaluating vehicles in this class, and the Q3 presents an interesting proposition. While it carries the Audi badge and associated premium feel, it also faces stiff competition in a market brimming with value-packed alternatives. Let’s delve into a detailed review of the Audi Q3, exploring its strengths and weaknesses to determine if it remains a compelling choice for today’s drivers.
Performance and Handling: Smooth Operator, But Not a Thrill Ride
One of the most immediately noticeable aspects of the 2016 Audi Q3 is its transmission. Audi’s decision to employ a traditional Tiptronic automatic transmission instead of their often-used dual-clutch system is a significant plus for daily driving. Many automotive enthusiasts, myself included, appreciate the nuances of a DCT in performance cars, but for everyday usability, a conventional automatic like the one in the Q3 offers superior smoothness, especially when starting from a standstill and navigating city traffic. This Tiptronic transmission excels in providing remarkably smooth shifts, aligning perfectly with the needs of typical SUV drivers who prioritize comfort and ease of use over razor-sharp gear changes.
Engine and Transmission: Adequate Power Delivery
Under the hood, the Q3 features a 2.0-liter turbocharged engine paired with the aforementioned six-speed automatic transmission. This combination delivers smooth and linear power, effectively minimizing noticeable turbo lag in normal driving conditions. Unless you’re pushing the Q3 to its limits, the power delivery is civil and predictable, ideal for daily commutes and family errands. For moments when you desire a more spirited drive, shifting the gear selector to “S” mode (Sport) sharpens the engine response and holds gears for longer durations. This sport mode injects a dose of added excitement, making the Q3 feel more responsive and eager.
Audi states a 0-60 mph acceleration time of approximately 8.2 seconds for the Q3. While this is adequate for a family-oriented vehicle, it’s not particularly quick for a premium German SUV in this price range. Compared to some competitors, the Q3’s acceleration might feel somewhat leisurely. For instance, as the original article humorously points out, a Mazda CX-3, a vehicle in a lower price bracket, might offer comparable or even superior acceleration.
Handling and Ride Quality: Competent but Quirky
The Audi Q3 generally handles well, offering a composed and confident driving experience. The ride quality is tuned to be comfortable, avoiding excessive firmness that can be jarring on rough roads. However, during our road tests, a peculiar characteristic emerged: the rear end of the Q3 exhibited a slight “hop” or sideways movement when encountering uneven road surfaces. This sensation, also noted in tests of the Audi A3, isn’t alarming in typical driving scenarios, but it does raise questions about the vehicle’s composure when pushed harder in corners, particularly on bumpy roads or off-ramps. While likely within acceptable limits for most drivers, this rear suspension behavior is worth noting, especially for those who prioritize ultimate handling precision.
Interior and Features: Spacious Enough, Infotainment Needs Improvement
Stepping inside the Audi Q3 reveals a cabin that is adequately sized for its class. Even for taller individuals, like myself at 6 feet, the Q3 provides comfortable seating both in the front and rear, even when sitting behind a driver’s seat adjusted for my height. While not exceptionally spacious, the interior dimensions are well-utilized, offering sufficient room for passengers without feeling cramped. The driver’s seat in particular stands out for its comfort and adjustability, featuring power controls, effective heating, and lumbar support that enhances driving comfort on longer journeys. The cargo area is also commendable for a compact SUV, providing practical storage space, further enhanced by the inclusion of a compact spare tire beneath the cargo floor – a feature appreciated for its added peace of mind.
Infotainment System: MMI Rotary Dial – Style Over Substance?
The infotainment system in the 2016 Audi Q3 is controlled via Audi’s MMI rotary knob interface. While intended to project a premium feel, in practice, the MMI system can be frustrating to use. The dashboard layout in the Q3 is conducive to a touchscreen interface, placing controls within easy reach. Audi’s choice to implement a rotary dial system, instead of a more intuitive touchscreen, seems like a decision driven more by perceived sophistication than user-friendliness. In contrast, as the original review mentions, the touchscreen system found in the Volkswagen GTI, a vehicle within the same automotive group, offers a more straightforward and user-friendly experience. This reliance on rotary dial controls is a trend seen across several premium automakers, but it often compromises ease of use compared to modern touchscreen systems.
Fuel Economy and Safety: Areas of Concern
Fuel economy and safety are two areas where the 2016 Audi Q3 lags behind some of its competitors. The EPA-rated fuel economy for the Q3 Quattro is surprisingly low, at just 23 MPG combined and 20 MPG city. In comparison, the Mazda CX-3 achieves significantly better figures, rated at 29 MPG combined and 27 MPG city. Furthermore, the Q3 requires premium fuel, adding to the overall running costs. Even larger vehicles like the Subaru Outback offer superior fuel economy while providing comparable performance in everyday driving scenarios.
Safety is another critical consideration. The absence of a forward collision prevention system on the 2016 Audi Q3 means it doesn’t qualify for the highest safety ratings from the IIHS (Top Safety Pick+). For a vehicle often marketed towards young families, the lack of advanced safety features is a notable drawback, especially when competitors in the same class offer these technologies.
Pros and Cons: 2016 Audi Q3 at a Glance
Pros:
- Just the Right Size: Offers a good balance of interior space and maneuverability for urban environments.
- Smooth, Non-DCT Transmission: Traditional automatic provides a refined and hassle-free driving experience in daily use.
- Premium Interior Feel: Cabin materials and design convey a sense of quality and sophistication expected from the Audi brand.
Cons:
- Questionable Rear Suspension Behavior: Rear end can feel unsettled on rough roads, potentially impacting handling confidence in certain situations.
- Disappointing Fuel Economy: Low MPG figures and premium fuel requirement increase running costs.
- Missing Key Safety Features: Lack of forward collision prevention system is a significant omission in a family-oriented vehicle.
Conclusion: A Decent Premium Option, But Consider the Competition
The 2016 Audi Q3 is undoubtedly a fun-to-drive compact SUV with sufficient space for small families. It offers a comfortable ride, a premium ambiance, and attractive styling. However, when evaluating the Q3 in the broader context of its competitive segment, some shortcomings become apparent. Vehicles from Mazda, Subaru, and Toyota offer similar positive attributes while often providing more advanced safety systems, better fuel economy, and a lower overall cost of ownership. While the Audi badge carries prestige, prospective buyers should carefully weigh the Q3’s premium appeal against the practical advantages offered by its rivals before making a final decision.
