When Mazda unveiled the CX-50, many speculated about its place in the lineup alongside the popular CX-5. Would it replace the CX-5, or would both models coexist? Initially, it seemed Mazda might follow its pattern with the CX-9 and CX-90, or the CX-3 and CX-30. However, Mazda has opted to keep the CX-5 as a more budget-conscious option, while the CX-50 emerges as its slightly larger and more contemporary counterpart. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of the CX-5 and CX-50 to help you decide which Mazda compact SUV best suits your needs.
Size and Dimensions: Space and Practicality
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete within the crowded compact SUV segment. However, the CX-5 leans towards the more compact end of this class. Measuring 180 inches in length, it is noticeably shorter than rivals like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan. While this might seem minor, it translates to less rear legroom, which can be a concern for taller passengers on longer journeys. The CR-V and Tiguan offer significantly more spacious rear seating.
Alt text: Side-by-side comparison of Mazda CX-5 and CX-50, highlighting the difference in length between the two compact SUVs.
Addressing the need for more space, Mazda designed the CX-50 to be larger. It extends 6 inches longer than the CX-5, resulting in increased passenger room and a more generous cargo area. Although the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan still offer greater overall roominess, the CX-50 provides a more comfortable and practical interior compared to the CX-5, making it a step up in terms of spaciousness.
Performance and Engine Options: Power and Efficiency
Mazda has equipped both the CX-5 and CX-50 with identical powertrain options for most model years, ensuring similar performance characteristics. The standard engine for both SUVs is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For drivers seeking enhanced performance, a turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is available, delivering 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, or an even more potent 256 hp and 320 lb-ft on premium 93 octane fuel. With the turbocharged engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 rank among the quicker non-luxury compact SUVs available, offering brisk acceleration and responsive power.
Alt text: Close-up view of the turbocharged engine in a Mazda CX-5, showcasing the powertrain shared with the CX-50 for enhanced performance.
However, the CX-50 gains a significant advantage with the introduction of a hybrid powertrain starting with the 2025 model year. This Toyota-sourced hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, achieving a combined output of 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid boasts a superior EPA-estimated combined fuel economy of 38 mpg, significantly better than the standard engine’s 28 mpg combined and the turbo engine’s 25 mpg combined. This fuel-efficient hybrid option is not available for the CX-5, giving the CX-50 a clear edge for environmentally conscious buyers and those prioritizing fuel savings.
