Mazda’s compact SUV lineup currently features two compelling models: the CX-5 and the newer CX-50. While both occupy the same vehicle class, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. Understanding the distinctions between the CX-50 vs CX-5 is crucial for buyers looking for the right Mazda SUV. This article breaks down the key differences to help you decide which model better suits your lifestyle.
Size and Space Comparison
One of the most noticeable differences between the CX-5 and CX-50 is their size. The Mazda CX-5, at 180 inches long, is positioned as a truly compact SUV, making it easy to maneuver in city environments. However, this smaller footprint translates to less interior space, particularly in the rear seats, which might feel cramped for taller adults on longer journeys. Competitors like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan offer significantly more rear passenger room.
Recognizing the demand for more spacious compact SUVs, Mazda introduced the CX-50. Stretching 6 inches longer than the CX-5, the CX-50 provides a more generous cabin. This increased length benefits both passenger space and cargo capacity, making the CX-50 a more comfortable and practical option for families or those needing extra room. While the CR-V and Tiguan still lead in overall spaciousness, the CX-50 represents a significant step up in interior volume compared to the CX-5.
Performance and Engine Options
In terms of performance, the CX-5 and CX-50 share similar engine lineups, at least for the initial models. Both SUVs come standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides adequate power for daily driving and offers reasonable fuel efficiency.
For drivers seeking more spirited performance, both the CX-5 and CX-50 offer an optional turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine. This upgraded engine delivers a significant boost in power, producing 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, and even more – 256 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque – when using premium 93 octane fuel. Equipped with the turbo engine, both SUVs become surprisingly quick for the compact SUV class, offering brisk acceleration and enhanced driving enjoyment.
Looking ahead, the CX-50 distinguishes itself with an upcoming hybrid powertrain option for the 2025 model year. This hybrid system, sourced from Toyota, combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid is projected to achieve 38 mpg in combined EPA cycle, a substantial improvement over both the standard (28 mpg combined) and turbo (25 mpg combined) engines. Currently, a hybrid powertrain is not available for the CX-5, giving the CX-50 a clear advantage in fuel efficiency and eco-friendliness for those seeking a greener SUV.
Conclusion: Choosing Between CX-5 and CX-50
Deciding between the CX-50 vs CX-5 ultimately depends on your priorities. The Mazda CX-5 remains a compelling choice for buyers prioritizing a truly compact size and potentially a lower price point. It’s a well-rounded SUV that’s fun to drive and offers Mazda’s signature style and quality.
However, if you need more passenger and cargo space, and are interested in future hybrid technology, the Mazda CX-50 emerges as the stronger contender. While slightly larger, it still retains Mazda’s engaging driving dynamics and elevates the interior space and versatility. The upcoming hybrid version further enhances its appeal for those seeking fuel efficiency. Consider your spatial needs and performance desires when making your final decision between these two excellent Mazda SUVs.
