The Fisker Karma, a striking extended-range electric car, has captured attention with its unique design and futuristic hum. However, after extensive testing, this vehicle has proven to be more frustrating than fascinating, ultimately earning a failing grade.
In fact, the Karma holds the unfortunate title of our lowest-rated luxury sedan. Among all sedans we’ve tested, only a few models score lower overall, placing the Fisker Karma in unfavorable company. This poor rating isn’t due to one major flaw, but rather a collection of significant shortcomings that impact the overall driving experience and value.
Our experience with the Karma was plagued with issues from the start. An early breakdown on our test track rendered the car immobile, necessitating a battery replacement. This was just the beginning. Frequent instrument panel glitches, problematic windows and radio, and persistent warning lights became routine. Our test Karma required multiple visits to the dealership, and while the service itself was commendable, the recurring problems were not. It’s crucial to note that these specific issues with our test vehicle, while frustrating, are not the sole basis for the low score. The more fundamental design and execution compromises are the primary factors behind this disappointing assessment.
The Fisker Karma suffers from several inherent flaws. The dashboard controls are poorly designed and unintuitive. Visibility is limited, creating challenges for the driver. The interior feels cramped, and entering or exiting the seats is awkward. When the engine operates, it is surprisingly noisy, detracting from the luxury experience. Battery recharge times are lengthy, and both the backseat and trunk space are notably small. Furthermore, the Karma’s considerable weight, comparable to an SUV, negatively affects its agility and overall performance. Despite its sporty appearance, the Karma simply lacks the expected power and responsiveness.
When considering a luxury vehicle with a price tag exceeding $100,000, expectations are naturally high. The Fisker Karma, unfortunately, falls significantly short of these expectations. In a previous comparison test against the Porsche Panamera, another high-end vehicle in the same price range that Fisker positioned as a competitor, the Karma was decisively outclassed. While the Panamera may not offer the same fuel economy benefits, it surpasses the Karma in virtually every other aspect, outscoring it by a substantial margin.
Undeniably, the Fisker Karma is an attention-grabbing car, turning heads wherever it goes. Fisker, as a relatively small startup, deserves recognition for bringing the Karma to market at all. This accomplishment is a testament to their ambition, especially considering the high failure rate of new automotive companies in an industry dominated by established giants. However, the Karma serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with being an early adopter of cutting-edge and unproven automotive technology. For potential buyers seeking a truly refined and reliable luxury electric vehicle, the Fisker Karma, in its current form, is difficult to recommend.
