The 2010 Infiniti Fx50 Car emerges as a powerful contender in the luxury SUV market, closely mirroring its 2009 predecessor. From its robust 390-horsepower V8 engine to its imposing 21-inch wheels, the FX50 maintains the core features that defined the prior model year. The most notable update for the 2010 version is the integration of a Bluetooth-compatible DVD entertainment system, a subtle enhancement that distinguishes it from the earlier iteration. Beyond this tech upgrade, the Infiniti FX50 car largely retains the specifications and characteristics of the 2009 model.
Positioned in a competitive segment, the FX50 car enters a price range where consumers might also consider the Porsche Cayenne or the BMW X6. While the Infiniti FX50 car boasts comparable specifications and a rich feature set, it potentially lacks the established brand prestige associated with its European rivals. This places the FX50 car in an interesting position for buyers weighing performance and features against brand cachet in the luxury SUV category.
Infiniti adopted a distinctive design approach for the FX50 car and its sibling, the FX35. The flowing, curvaceous lines of the FX50 car are a point of contention, eliciting strong reactions from observers. The styling of the FX50 car tends to polarize opinions, falling distinctly into either the “love it” or “hate it” camp, with little middle ground.
Staff Opinions on the FX50 Car
Tim Suddard, Publisher Emeritus, shares a critical perspective on the FX50 car: Expressing strong disapproval, Suddard suggests vehicles like the FX50 car might contribute to road rage among SUV drivers. He critiques the FX50 car as offering cramped seating for its class despite a hefty $65,000 price tag, accompanied by significant road noise and an unnecessarily powerful 5.0-liter engine. Further criticisms include tramlining from the 20-inch wheels, oversized tires impacting highway driving, and a harsh ride reminiscent of an older Ford pickup truck. Ergonomic issues, such as a complex radio system and an intrusive technology package, are also highlighted. Suddard concludes his review of the FX50 car by recommending alternatives like a Honda Ridgeline and Ford Flex as superior choices for the price.
Tom Heath, UberDork, views the FX50 car as a missed opportunity: While Heath found the ride quality of the FX50 car less objectionable than Suddard, he struggles to identify any area where the FX50 car surpasses the G37, its platform sibling. For buyers considering a $50,000+ SUV, Heath suggests numerous alternatives he would choose over the FX50 car. The vehicle’s styling, which he refers to as “rolling uterus”, is also mentioned as a negative aspect. Heath humorously proposes that the Grand Cherokee SRT-8 might be a more sensible option in comparison to the FX50 car.
In conclusion, the 2010 Infiniti FX50 car presents a mixed bag. It offers substantial power and features, yet faces criticism regarding its ride comfort, ergonomics, and polarizing design. Compared to competitors and even within Infiniti’s own lineup, the FX50 car’s value proposition appears questionable according to these reviews.
