When Mazda unveiled the CX-50, many speculated about the fate of the beloved CX-5. Would it be phased out, or would both compact SUVs coexist? Drawing from Mazda’s history, either outcome seemed plausible. However, Mazda has opted for a different route, positioning the CX-5 as the more budget-friendly option while the CX-50 steps in as its slightly larger and more contemporary sibling. If you’re navigating the compact SUV market and considering these two Mazdas, let’s delve into a detailed comparison to help you decide which best fits your needs.
Size and Dimensions: Space Matters
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete in the competitive compact SUV segment. However, within this class, size variations exist. The CX-5, measuring 180 inches in length, leans towards the more compact side. Compared to rivals like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan, it’s noticeably shorter. This dimension translates to a slightly tighter rear passenger space, which might be a consideration for taller individuals needing ample legroom in the back. In contrast, the Honda and VW offer a more spacious feel, particularly in the rear seats.
Recognizing the demand for increased space, Mazda designed the CX-50 to be more accommodating. Extending 6 inches longer than the CX-5, the CX-50 provides not only enhanced passenger room but also a larger cargo area. While the CR-V and Tiguan still maintain their lead in overall spaciousness, the CX-50 successfully elevates the comfort and practicality compared to the CX-5, offering a more generous interior environment for both passengers and cargo.
Performance and Engine Options: Power and Efficiency
Mazda has maintained powertrain consistency between the CX-5 and CX-50. Both models share the same engine lineup, starting with a standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For drivers seeking a more spirited driving experience, a turbocharged version is available, boosting output to 227 hp and 310 lb-ft on regular fuel, or an even more potent 256 hp and 320 lb-ft when using 93 octane gasoline. Equipped with the turbocharged engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 stand out as remarkably quick performers in the non-luxury compact SUV category.
However, the CX-50 distinguishes itself with an upcoming addition to its powertrain offerings. Starting with the 2025 model year, the CX-50 will feature a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain. This system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, delivering a combined 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid significantly improves fuel efficiency, achieving 38 mpg in combined EPA cycle, a notable upgrade from both the standard engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbo engine (25 mpg combined). This hybrid option is currently exclusive to the CX-50, giving it an edge in fuel economy and eco-conscious driving.
Conclusion: Choosing Your Mazda Compact SUV
In the showdown of Mazda Cx-5 Vs Cx-50, the ideal choice depends on your priorities. The CX-5 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who appreciate Mazda’s driving dynamics and stylish design in a more compact package. If you prioritize interior space, a slightly more rugged aesthetic, and the option of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain in the near future, the Mazda CX-50 emerges as the more appealing choice. Both SUVs deliver Mazda’s signature driving enjoyment and quality, but cater to slightly different needs and preferences within the compact SUV landscape.
