When the Mazda CX-50 was launched, many wondered about its place alongside the popular CX-5. Instead of replacing the CX-5, Mazda opted to offer both compact SUVs, each with its own distinct appeal. This approach gives buyers a choice within the Mazda compact SUV lineup. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of the Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-50 specs to help you decide which model better suits your needs.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: Dimensions and Size
While both the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-50 compete in the compact SUV category, their dimensions reveal key differences. The Mazda CX-5 is undeniably compact, measuring 180 inches in length. This makes it shorter than rivals like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan. This smaller footprint translates to a tighter rear row, which might be less comfortable for taller passengers on longer journeys. The Honda and VW offer noticeably more spacious back seats.
Recognizing the demand for more space, Mazda designed the CX-50 to be larger. The Mazda CX-50 extends to 185.8 inches in length, a full 6 inches longer than the CX-5. This increased length provides both enhanced passenger room and a larger cargo area. While the CR-V and Tiguan still offer more interior volume overall, the CX-50 aims to deliver a more comfortable and practical space compared to the CX-5.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: Engine and Performance Specs
In terms of powertrain, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-50 initially shared identical engine options. Both models come standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For those seeking more spirited performance, a turbocharged 2.5-liter variant is available for both SUVs. This turbo engine delivers 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, and increases to 256 hp and 320 lb-ft when using 93 octane fuel. Equipped with the turbo engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 offer brisk acceleration, placing them among the quicker compact SUVs outside the luxury segment.
However, a significant difference emerges with the Mazda CX-50. Starting with the 2025 model year, the CX-50 introduces a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain option. This hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid boasts a significantly improved fuel economy rating of 38 mpg in combined driving, according to EPA estimates. This is a notable upgrade in efficiency compared to both the standard 2.5-liter engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbo engine (25 mpg combined). Crucially, a hybrid powertrain is not offered for the Mazda CX-5, making it a unique advantage for the CX-50.
In conclusion, when considering Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-50 specs, the CX-50 offers a larger size and the option of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain, while the CX-5 remains a more compact and budget-friendly choice with similar performance from its gasoline engines. Your preference will depend on your priorities for space, fuel efficiency, and budget within the Mazda compact SUV range.
