The Honda CR-V has long been a top pick in the compact SUV category, celebrated for its practicality and reliability. Following a comprehensive redesign for 2023, it boasts increased rear legroom, a more refined hybrid powertrain, and enhanced technology features. However, the Mazda CX-50 emerges as a compelling alternative, distinguished by its striking design, upscale interior, and potent turbocharged engine option. In this comparison, we delve into the strengths and weaknesses of the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V to determine which SUV comes out on top.
Performance and Fuel Efficiency
Under the hood, the Mazda CX-50 features a standard four-cylinder engine coupled with all-wheel drive. This configuration achieves an EPA-estimated 27 mpg in combined city/highway driving. An optional turbocharged engine is available for those seeking more power, though fuel economy slightly decreases to 25 mpg combined. In contrast, the base Honda CR-V with all-wheel drive offers a superior EPA estimate of up to 30 mpg. The hybrid CR-V model extends fuel efficiency even further, reaching 37 mpg combined.
While the Honda CR-V excels in fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 compensates with a more engaging driving experience, particularly with its engine options. The CX-50’s base engine delivers 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque, while the CR-V’s base engine produces 190 horsepower but slightly less torque at 179 lb-ft. The real difference is felt with the CX-50 Turbo, which unleashes 256 horsepower and a substantial 310 lb-ft of torque when using 93 octane fuel. The CR-V hybrid, while efficient, produces a more modest 204 horsepower and 247 lb-ft of torque. In independent testing, the turbocharged CX-50 demonstrated quicker acceleration, achieving 0 to 60 mph in 7.2 seconds compared to the Honda hybrid’s 8.0 seconds.
Both SUVs present appealing performance characteristics. The Honda CR-V prioritizes fuel savings, while the Mazda CX-50, especially in turbocharged form, offers quicker acceleration and standard all-wheel drive, making it a more performance-oriented choice.
Winner: Tie
Interior Technology and Cargo Space
The Mazda CX-50 is equipped with a standard 8.8-inch center display screen, slightly larger than the Honda CR-V’s standard 7-inch touchscreen. Higher trims of the CR-V offer a 9-inch touchscreen upgrade. Both systems are user-friendly, but the CR-V’s purely touchscreen interface might be preferred by some drivers for its directness. The CX-50 utilizes a rotary control knob for navigating menus, alongside touchscreen functionality for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
In terms of driver assistance technology, both SUVs are well-equipped with standard features like adaptive cruise control and lane-centering steering. However, Mazda provides blind-spot warning as standard across all CX-50 trims, while it remains an optional feature for the Honda CR-V.
When it comes to practicality, the Honda CR-V excels in cargo capacity. It offers 39.3 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats, significantly more than the Mazda CX-50’s 31.4 cubic feet. Folding down the CR-V’s second row expands cargo volume to an impressive 76.5 cubic feet. While technology preferences are subjective, the CR-V clearly leads in the crucial area of cargo space.
Winner: Honda CR-V
Comfort and Driving Dynamics
The Mazda CX-50 distinguishes itself with a more refined interior, featuring higher-quality materials and more supportive front seats, creating a more premium and comfortable cabin environment. Available features include heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, and commendable noise insulation, minimizing road noise intrusion. The CX-50 also offers engaging handling, contributing to a more dynamic driving experience, although this comes with a slightly firmer ride quality.
Conversely, the Honda CR-V prioritizes ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections for a smoother ride. While bumps are still perceptible, the CR-V quickly regains its composure. However, under hard acceleration, the CR-V can feel more strained compared to the CX-50, and the hybrid powertrain can exhibit some noise. Cabin noise is otherwise well-controlled. The Honda CR-V does not offer ventilated front seats or heated rear seats.
Winner: Mazda CX-50
Pricing and Overall Value
Honda maintains a strong reputation for build quality, reflected in the CR-V. While Honda incorporates hard plastics in the interior, they are strategically placed in less frequently touched areas. The base Honda CR-V LX trim starts at $30,795 (including destination fee), and the top-tier Sport Touring Hybrid reaches $40,795.
Mazda positions the CX-50 at a slightly higher price point. The base 2.5 S trim starts at $31,675, and the top-of-the-line Turbo Premium Plus trim commands a price of $45,125. However, the Mazda CX-50 justifies its price with a more upscale interior, standard all-wheel drive, and a more premium overall design aesthetic. The CX-50 delivers a near-luxury feel that sets it apart from other small SUVs in its class.
Winner: Tie
Edmunds’ Verdict: Both the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V are highly competitive SUVs, each with distinct strengths. The Honda CR-V is the clear choice for buyers prioritizing a comfortable ride and maximum cargo space. However, for those seeking a touch of luxury and a more engaging driving experience in a small SUV, the Mazda CX-50 presents an undeniable appeal.
