The Nissan GT-R burst onto the scene as a performance powerhouse, challenging established supercars with its impressive technology and blistering speed. Soon after its U.S. debut, I had the opportunity to spend considerable time behind the wheel of a GT-R, an experience that naturally led to comparisons with another performance icon in my garage at the time: the Ford GT. While not direct competitors, contrasting these two exceptional machines proved to be a fascinating study in automotive philosophy and execution. Both excel in delivering exhilarating performance, but beyond that, their paths diverge significantly.
Ford GT and Nissan GT-R side by side
Performance Showdown: 0-60 and Beyond
Let’s address the numbers that often dominate supercar discussions, particularly the Nissan GT-R zero to 60 mph sprint. In initial tests, the Nissan GT-R clocked a remarkable zero-to-60 mph time of just 3.53 seconds. This figure was achieved using its launch control system. Without launch control, the 0-60 mph time increased to a still-respectable 4.0 seconds. The quarter-mile followed in 11.77 seconds at 118 mph with launch control, and 12.3 seconds at the same speed without. It’s worth noting that the availability and implications of using launch control on the GT-R, especially concerning warranty coverage, were points of discussion among owners and enthusiasts.
The Ford GT, in its initial testing, demonstrated a zero-to-60 mph time of 3.7 seconds and a quarter-mile in 11.8 seconds at 124 mph. Interestingly, after a supercharger pulley upgrade and ECU recalibration, the Ford GT shaved its 0-60 time down to 3.5 seconds and the quarter-mile to 11.6 seconds at 126.3 mph. The Ford GT relies on driver skill and technique rather than launch control for optimal acceleration, requiring a nuanced approach to avoid clutch overheating. Despite rigorous use and over 17,000 miles, the Ford GT’s original transmission remained robust.
Further performance metrics reveal a close contest. Braking from 60-to-zero mph in the Nissan GT-R was measured at 108 feet. While official braking figures for the Ford GT from the same test weren’t available, a separate American Exotics Comparison Test recorded a 60 mph stopping distance of 115 feet for the Ford GT. In slalom testing, the GT-R achieved 73.6 mph, while the Ford GT managed 69.5 mph. Skidpad measurements showed the GT-R pulling 0.91 Gs and the Ford GT slightly edging it out at 0.92 Gs in a different comparison.
Objectively, performance between these two is remarkably close. However, the GT-R offered this level of performance at a significantly lower price point when new, leading many to initially perceive it as the superior value proposition.
Design and Aesthetics: Subjectivity vs. Icon Status
When it comes to visual appeal, opinions are inherently subjective. Both the Nissan GT-R and Ford GT possess distinctive designs that evoke strong reactions. The GT-R embodies a modern, aggressive aesthetic with sharp lines and a futuristic stance, reflecting its technological prowess. The Ford GT, on the other hand, is a retro-inspired masterpiece, paying homage to the iconic GT40 race cars of the 1960s. Its low-slung profile, sweeping curves, and exposed engine bay exude a classic supercar aura. Ultimately, deciding which car is more visually appealing is a matter of personal taste.
Driving Dynamics: Feel the Road
Beyond outright speed, the driving experience distinguishes these two cars significantly. Steering feel is a prime example, where the Ford GT holds a considerable advantage. The GT’s hydraulically assisted steering provides a rich stream of feedback, connecting the driver intimately with the road surface. The Nissan GT-R, with its all-wheel-drive system, inherently faces challenges in delivering the same level of steering purity. While advancements in technology have narrowed this gap in cars like the Audi R8 and Porsche 911 Turbo, the GT-R’s steering, while precise, lacks the nuanced communication of the Ford GT.
Braking feel follows a similar pattern. The GT-R’s brakes are undeniably powerful, offering immense stopping force. However, modulating the brakes for nuanced deceleration is more intuitive in the Ford GT. The GT-R’s braking can feel somewhat abrupt, lacking the progressive feel of the Ford GT’s system.
Ride quality also contrasts sharply. Despite the Nissan GT-R’s advanced adjustable suspension, even in its “comfort” setting, the ride is noticeably firmer than the fixed suspension Ford GT. This is unexpected, especially considering the GT-R doesn’t demonstrably outperform the Ford GT in handling prowess to justify the ride compromise.
The auditory experience further separates these cars. The Ford GT, even in stock configuration, produces a more evocative exhaust note. The test Ford GT was equipped with a Ford Racing exhaust system, which amplified its V8 rumble into a truly captivating soundtrack, eclipsing the GT-R’s somewhat truck-like engine sound.
Transmission characteristics also contribute to their differing driving personalities. The Nissan GT-R features a dual-clutch transmission (DCT), offering quick and efficient gear changes. While convenient for daily driving and allowing those unfamiliar with manual transmissions to drive it, the GT-R’s DCT execution, as noted previously, can exhibit some throttle response lag. This delay occurs as the car’s computer processes throttle input in relation to various parameters, sometimes resulting in a less direct connection between driver input and engine response.
The Ford GT’s traditional manual transmission offers a direct and engaging driving experience. With no electronic intermediaries, the Ford GT’s throttle response is immediate and predictable. The manual gearbox also facilitates techniques like heel-and-toe downshifting, further enhancing driver involvement.
Daily Driving and Practicality
In terms of everyday usability, the Nissan GT-R presents several advantages. Its seats offer greater adjustability and comfort for a wider range of body types. The GT-R also technically offers rear seats, albeit very compact ones best suited for small children. The GT-R’s infotainment system is significantly more advanced than the Ford GT’s original unit. While the test Ford GT had been upgraded with an aftermarket system to match the GT-R’s features, the factory GT-R system is more modern and integrated.
Ingress and egress are also easier in the GT-R due to its conventional doors and higher seating position. The Ford GT’s low-slung design and wide door sills present a greater challenge for daily entry and exit.
Value Proposition and the Final Verdict
The Nissan GT-R undeniably offered exceptional performance for its price point when initially released. It combined supercar-level acceleration, as demonstrated by its impressive Nissan GT-R zero to 60 time, with a degree of daily usability. For buyers prioritizing performance on a budget and requiring some level of practicality, the GT-R presented a compelling package.
However, the Ford GT delivered a more complete and emotionally engaging exotic car experience. While performance figures were comparable, the Ford GT excelled in delivering a more visceral and connected driving experience through its superior steering feel, braking modulation, throttle response, and evocative exhaust note. For those seeking a purist sports car experience that transcends spreadsheet metrics and values driver engagement above all else, the Ford GT held a distinct appeal.
Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan GT-R and Ford GT boils down to individual priorities. The GT-R is the rational choice for performance value and daily usability, while the Ford GT caters to those who prioritize driving purity and the intangible qualities of an iconic sports car. Regardless of preference, driving either of these machines guarantees attention and admiration.
